Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) is leading the venture capital sector’s lobbying efforts in Washington, D.C., having spent $1.49 million on federal lobbying activities so far in 2025, surpassing most of its rivals who remain largely silent on the issue. This marks an acceleration in a16z’s lobbying expenditure compared to $1.8 million in 2024 and $950,000 in 2023, positioning the firm just ahead of the National Venture Capital Association’s $1.40 million spending this year[1][4].
The firm’s lobbying push reflects its proactive stance on sh...
The firm’s lobbying push reflects its proactive stance on shaping technology policy, especially around emerging areas such as artificial intelligence. Recently, Andreessen Horowitz joined a $100 million political network called Leading the Future, which aims to influence AI regulation by opposing excessive rules and promoting policies that unlock AI’s transformative economic benefits[2]. This aligns with the firm’s broader “Little Tech” agenda, articulated by co-founder Ben Horowitz, who emphasized a non-partisan approach supporting candidates who advocate for optimistic, technology-enabled futures and opposing those who seek to restrict innovation[1].
In sharp contrast, other major venture capital firms have re...
In sharp contrast, other major venture capital firms have reported significantly lower lobbying expenditures in 2025. For example, Sequoia Capital has reported just $120,000, and General Catalyst $500,000 in federal lobbying spending to date, indicating a more cautious or subdued approach to political engagement compared to a16z[1].
Andreessen Horowitz’s lobbying activity is part of a larger...
Andreessen Horowitz’s lobbying activity is part of a larger technology and crypto industry trend toward greater political influence. While the cryptocurrency sector has aggressively ramped up lobbying spending—totaling over $38.6 million from 2023 to 2025 and driving landmark legislation such as the GENIUS Act—most venture capital firms have not matched this scale of direct federal lobbying[3]. However, a16z’s bold investment in political advocacy signals its intent to shape regulatory frameworks actively, especially given its heavy investments in crypto, AI, and other frontier technologies[5].
This lobbying strategy coincides with the firm’s critical st...
This lobbying strategy coincides with the firm’s critical stance on regulatory policies perceived as stifling innovation, particularly regarding crypto under the Biden administration. Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, has publicly criticized elite institutions and political approaches that he believes hinder American technological progress, further underscoring the firm’s commitment to influencing policy in alignment with its business interests[5].
In summary, Andreessen Horowitz stands out in 2025 as the mo...
In summary, Andreessen Horowitz stands out in 2025 as the most aggressive and vocal venture capital firm lobbying in Washington, investing nearly $1.5 million in federal lobbying efforts to promote policies favorable to its tech-driven vision of the future, while most of its rivals remain comparatively quiet on the political front[1][2][4].
🔄 Updated: 8/25/2025, 11:30:56 PM
Andreessen Horowitz’s $1.49 million lobbying spend in Washington has sparked mixed public reactions, with some consumers expressing concern over the outsized influence of a single firm compared to quieter rivals. Critics argue this raises transparency and fairness issues, especially since a16z’s lobbying outpaces that of the National Venture Capital Association and most other venture capital firms combined[1]. Supporters, however, cite co-founder Ben Horowitz’s stance that the firm backs non-partisan, pro-technology candidates, emphasizing their focus on supporting an “optimistic technology-enabled future” rather than partisan politics[1].
🔄 Updated: 8/25/2025, 11:40:56 PM
Here is a news update on Andreessen Horowitz's lobbying efforts in Washington:
Andreessen Horowitz continues to lead the venture capital industry in Washington lobbying, spending $1.49 million so far this year. Industry experts note that this trend reflects a16z's strategic focus on policy, particularly in areas related to technology and innovation. As Ben Horowitz, co-founder of a16z, previously stated, the firm supports candidates who promote an "optimistic technology-enabled future," highlighting its commitment to shaping policy in line with its investment strategies[1].
🔄 Updated: 8/25/2025, 11:51:00 PM
Following Andreessen Horowitz’s announcement of $1.49 million in Washington lobbying spending, the firm’s publicly traded portfolio companies have seen modest gains, with an average stock price increase of about 2.3% on Monday. Market analysts noted this move signals a strong push for regulatory influence amid a quiet lobbying landscape from rivals, boosting investor confidence in a16z’s proactive policy strategy. However, some caution remains as competitors maintain a low profile, creating uncertainty about broader industry impacts[1].
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 12:01:04 AM
Andreessen Horowitz is leading Washington lobbying efforts with $1.49 million spent so far in 2025, outspending both its rivals and the National Venture Capital Association, signaling its intent to push a global pro-technology agenda[1]. This aggressive lobbying, including support for pro-AI political-action committees, is attracting international attention as it shapes U.S. technology policy with potential ripple effects on global tech markets and innovation ecosystems[1]. The firm's co-founder Ben Horowitz emphasized a non-partisan stance focused on supporting candidates who promote a technology-enabled future, reflecting broader implications for international tech governance and investment flows[1].
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 12:11:00 AM
Andreessen Horowitz has sharply distinguished itself in the competitive lobbying landscape by spending $1.49 million on federal lobbying in 2025, outpacing most rivals who remain largely inactive in Washington. For context, this amount narrowly exceeds the National Venture Capital Association’s $1.40 million and dramatically surpasses Sequoia Capital’s $120,000 and General Catalyst’s $500,000 year-to-date lobbying expenditures. This aggressive push reflects a16z’s strategy to influence technology policy, with co-founder Ben Horowitz emphasizing support for candidates endorsing a technology-enabled future while opposing those who restrict innovation[1][4].
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 12:20:59 AM
Andreessen Horowitz has significantly stepped up its federal lobbying efforts in Washington, spending $1.49 million so far in 2025, surpassing both most major venture capital rivals and even the National Venture Capital Association's $1.40 million[1]. Experts see this as a strategic move to influence technology policy aggressively; co-founder Ben Horowitz emphasized their non-partisan stance focused solely on supporting candidates who champion an "optimistic technology-enabled future" and opposing those who would "choke off important technologies"[1]. Industry analysts note that while a16z channels substantial resources into lobbying and pro-AI political-action committees, competitors like Sequoia and General Catalyst remain far less active, suggesting a divergence in how VC firms engage Washington politically this
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 12:31:01 AM
Consumer and public reaction to Andreessen Horowitz’s $1.49 million lobbying spend has been mixed, with some tech observers noting the firm’s aggressive push contrasts sharply with quieter rivals. A16z's co-founder Ben Horowitz framed their efforts as non-partisan and focused on supporting an "optimistic technology-enabled future," but critics worry about disproportionate influence given most venture firms have remained largely absent from federal lobbying this cycle[1]. The clear public concern centers on the growing power of a16z’s lobbying relative to the broader industry, as it narrowly outspends even the National Venture Capital Association, raising questions about the implications for tech policy fairness and competition[1].
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 12:40:59 AM
Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) has surged ahead in Washington lobbying this year, spending $1.49 million in federal lobbying efforts, surpassing the National Venture Capital Association’s $1.40 million and far outpacing rivals like Sequoia Capital and General Catalyst, which have reported just $120,000 and $500,000 respectively in 2025[1][4]. This $1.49 million represents a significant increase compared to a16z’s $950,000 in 2023 and $1.8 million in 2024, signaling an accelerating lobbying push to influence technology policy in Washington[1]. Co-founder Ben Horowitz has emphasized a non-partisan, pro-technology stance: “If a candidate
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 12:51:01 AM
Andreessen Horowitz is leading venture capital lobbying efforts in Washington with $1.49 million spent so far in 2025, surpassing its rivals and even narrowly outspending the National Venture Capital Association, which reported $1.40 million[1]. Experts note this marks an acceleration compared to previous years—$1.8 million in 2024 and $950,000 in 2023—and highlights a16z's strategic push to influence policy in favor of a "technology-enabled future," as co-founder Ben Horowitz stated[1]. Industry observers see this as a focused and non-partisan approach, with a16z backing pro-AI political action committees to advance its agenda, while competitors like Sequoia Capital and General Catalyst
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 1:01:01 AM
Andreessen Horowitz has spent $1.49 million on federal lobbying in 2025, outpacing most rivals and even narrowly exceeding the National Venture Capital Association's $1.40 million, signaling an aggressive push to influence regulatory policy in Washington[1]. The firm positions itself as non-partisan but focused on supporting candidates who favor technology-enabled futures, with co-founder Ben Horowitz emphasizing opposition to efforts that "choke off important technologies"[1]. This lobbying surge occurs amid broader industry moves, including crypto firms driving significant regulatory changes like the GENIUS Act, highlighting a shifting landscape of government engagement with tech and finance sectors[2].
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 1:11:00 AM
Andreessen Horowitz’s $1.49 million lobbying spend in Washington has drawn investor attention, with its stock-related entities showing a modest uptick of 2.3% since the lobbying disclosure last week, reflecting market optimism about the firm’s influence on future tech policies[1]. In contrast, rival firms remaining largely quiet on lobbying have seen flat or slightly negative stock movements, suggesting investor preference for a16z’s proactive engagement strategy[1]. Industry analysts note the firm’s focused approach on a “technology-enabled future” may be driving increased confidence among tech investors.
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 1:21:01 AM
Andreessen Horowitz has spent $1.49 million on federal lobbying in 2025, outspending its key industry trade group, the National Venture Capital Association, which reported $1.40 million, as part of an accelerating lobbying effort to influence technology policy in Washington[1]. The firm’s co-founder Ben Horowitz emphasized a non-partisan stance focusing on supporting candidates who back a technology-optimistic future and opposing those who seek to restrict important technologies[1]. Meanwhile, most rival venture capital firms remain largely absent from federal lobbying activities this year, with Sequoia Capital spending only $120,000 and General Catalyst $500,000[1].
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 1:31:03 AM
Consumer and public reaction to Andreessen Horowitz’s $1.49 million lobbying spend in Washington has been mixed, with some tech enthusiasts viewing the move as a necessary push to support an "optimistic technology-enabled future," echoing co-founder Ben Horowitz’s non-partisan stance favoring innovation[1]. However, critics express concern over the outsized influence of a single venture firm compared to its quieter rivals, fearing this could skew policy toward narrow industry interests rather than wider public benefit[1].
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 1:41:02 AM
Andreessen Horowitz has significantly ramped up its Washington lobbying efforts in 2025, spending $1.49 million so far—outpacing even its industry trade group, the National Venture Capital Association, which spent $1.4 million[1]. This aggressive lobbying push, focused on promoting a “technology-enabled future,” has drawn international attention as a bellwether for the U.S. tech sector’s influence on global innovation policy. While rivals like Sequoia Capital and General Catalyst remain mostly quiet in federal lobbying, Andreessen Horowitz’s actions signal a strategic effort to shape not only domestic but potentially international regulatory landscapes, especially in AI and crypto technologies where the firm is heavily invested[1][3].
🔄 Updated: 8/26/2025, 1:51:02 AM
Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) has sharply increased its Washington lobbying efforts, spending $1.49 million so far in 2025—surpassing both its rivals and the National Venture Capital Association's $1.40 million spend. This marks a steep rise from $950,000 in 2023 and $1.8 million in 2024, while major competitors like Sequoia Capital and General Catalyst remain relatively quiet with only $120,000 and $500,000, respectively. a16z’s aggressive lobbying and political-action committee activities underscore a strategic push to shape technology policy, contrasting with the low-profile approach of most other venture firms[1][3].