Y Combinator Claims Apple’s App Store Fees Are Stunting Startup Growth

📅 Published: 8/22/2025
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 7:31:23 PM
📊 15 updates
⏱️ 10 min read
📱 This article updates automatically every 10 minutes with breaking developments

Y Combinator has publicly criticized Apple’s App Store fees, asserting that they are significantly hindering the growth of startups in the technology sector. In a recent amicus brief filed in support of Epic Games, which is engaged in a high-profile legal battle against Apple, Y Combinator argued that Apple's App Store policies create unfair barriers for startups and stifle innovation by imposing hefty commissions and restricting alternative payment methods[1][2].

The dispute originated when Apple removed Epic Games' Fortni...

The dispute originated when Apple removed Epic Games' Fortnite from the App Store in 2020 after Epic introduced a direct in-app payment option to bypass Apple's standard 30% commission fee. Epic accused Apple of monopolistic control over iOS app distribution and payment processing. Apple defends its rules as necessary for user privacy and security, but critics including Y Combinator contend that these rules disproportionately affect smaller developers seeking flexibility to grow their businesses[1].

Y Combinator emphasized that Apple's "anti-steering restrain...

Y Combinator emphasized that Apple's "anti-steering restraints," which prevent developers from directing users to external payment options, increase costs for startups and reduce opportunities for innovation. The startup accelerator highlighted that these restrictions not only impact major companies like Epic but also harm smaller developers who rely on competitive flexibility to survive and expand in the market[2].

In April 2025, a court found Apple to be in "willful violati...

In April 2025, a court found Apple to be in "willful violation" of a 2021 injunction that required the company to allow developers to link to third-party purchase options outside the App Store without additional fees or restrictions. Although Apple implemented a system to comply, it charged up to a 27% fee for such links and subsequently appealed the ruling. Y Combinator and Epic Games are actively seeking to prevent Apple from reverting to its previous restrictive App Store policies[2].

The broader criticism is that Apple's closed ecosystem and h...

The broader criticism is that Apple's closed ecosystem and high commission fees stifle competition and innovation, ultimately harming consumers by limiting payment choices and keeping prices artificially high. This view aligns with concerns expressed by many developers over the years, who have found the App Store’s fee structure and enforcement policies burdensome, especially when updates or new features are contingent on compliance with Apple’s in-app purchase system[1][3].

This ongoing legal and public relations battle highlights th...

This ongoing legal and public relations battle highlights the tension between platform owners like Apple, who control critical distribution channels, and developers who seek more equitable terms to foster growth and innovation in the app economy. Y Combinator’s involvement underscores the importance of this issue for the future landscape of technology startups and digital marketplaces[1][2].

🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 5:11:02 PM
Y Combinator has filed an amicus brief supporting Epic Games in the ongoing legal battle against Apple, arguing that Apple’s 30% App Store fee, often called the "Apple Tax," significantly stifles startup growth and innovation by creating a prohibitive barrier to market entry. YC states that this fee can be "the difference between a company that can afford to scale, hire new employees, and reinvest in its product, and one that is perpetually struggling to stay afloat," and that the enforcement of Apple’s anti-steering restrictions has deterred venture capital investment in app-based businesses[2][4]. The brief urges the court to deny Apple’s appeal and uphold rules allowing developers to inform users about alternative payment methods, a chang
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 5:21:03 PM
Y Combinator has filed an amicus brief supporting Epic Games in their ongoing legal battle against Apple, arguing that the App Store’s 30% fee—often called the "Apple Tax"—is a "profound and often insurmountable barrier" that stifles startup growth and innovation by increasing costs and limiting flexibility[2][3]. They urged the court to deny Apple's appeal against the injunction requiring Apple to allow developers to link to alternative payment methods without restrictions or fees, emphasizing that this fee structure hinders startups’ ability to scale and reinvest in their products[2][3]. The next court argument is scheduled for October 21, 2025[2].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 5:31:03 PM
Following Y Combinator’s recent amicus brief supporting Epic Games' challenge to Apple’s App Store fees, market reactions showed increased scrutiny on Apple’s business model impacting startup growth. Despite limited immediate impact on Apple's stock price, some tech investors expressed concern that the 15-30% commission fees stifle innovation and competition, which could harm Apple's long-term ecosystem value, though Apple shares remained relatively stable in the $190-$195 range on the day of the filing[2][3]. Y Combinator highlighted that these fees create “a profound and often insurmountable barrier to entry” for startups, influencing investor sentiment around app-based business valuations[3].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 5:41:03 PM
Y Combinator has joined Epic Games in criticizing Apple’s App Store fees, calling the 30% commission a “profound and often insurmountable barrier” that stunts startup growth by limiting their ability to scale and innovate. In their recent amicus brief, Y Combinator stated the Apple Tax can be the difference between a startup thriving or struggling to stay afloat and urged courts to uphold rulings against Apple's restrictive payment policies[2][3]. Industry experts note that Apple’s anti-steering rules, which prevent developers from directing users to cheaper payment methods, reduce competition and ultimately harm consumers by keeping prices artificially high[1].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 5:51:06 PM
Y Combinator has filed an amicus brief supporting Epic Games in the ongoing legal battle against Apple, asserting that Apple’s 30% App Store fees—referred to as the "Apple Tax"—are a "profound and often insurmountable barrier" that stunts startup growth by limiting their ability to scale, hire, and innovate. The brief urged the court to deny Apple’s appeal against a ruling requiring it to allow developers to link to alternative payment options without fees or restrictions, emphasizing that the App Store's restrictions create "unfair barriers" and reduce competition[1][2][3]. The next court argument is scheduled for October 21, 2025[2].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 6:01:06 PM
Y Combinator has joined Epic Games in challenging Apple’s App Store fees, arguing that the mandatory 30% commission on in-app purchases stifles competition and innovation, especially harming startups trying to scale[3][4]. They highlight how this "Apple Tax" acts as a significant barrier to entry, limiting startups' ability to hire, reinvest, and grow, thus reshaping the competitive landscape by favoring established players that can absorb the high fees[4]. Y Combinator calls for an end to Apple's anti-steering rules to foster a more open and competitive market, in which startups can freely compete without being forced to pay inflated fees or restricted from alternative payment methods[3][4].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 6:11:11 PM
Y Combinator has joined Epic Games in accusing Apple’s 30% App Store fee of acting as a “punitive tax on innovation,” arguing it stunts startup growth by raising costs and limiting competition in the app ecosystem[1][4][5]. The startup accelerator emphasized that these fees block alternative payment methods and app distribution, ultimately harming smaller developers' ability to scale and reducing consumer choice[1]. Industry experts note that other platforms charge notably lower fees—eBay typically takes around 12.9%, and Alibaba’s AliExpress fees average 5-8%—highlighting that Apple’s high commission is out of line with market standards[2].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 6:21:01 PM
Y Combinator has publicly supported Epic Games in its legal battle against Apple, stating that Apple’s 30% App Store fees and anti-steering rules severely hinder startup growth globally by creating prohibitive barriers and stifling innovation. They argue these fees limit the ability of startups worldwide to scale, invest, and compete, calling for a permanent end to these restrictions to foster healthier global tech competition[1][2][5]. This stance has drawn attention internationally as developers and investors see Apple’s fees as a substantial obstacle that affects market dynamics beyond the U.S. tech ecosystem.
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 6:31:14 PM
Y Combinator, backing Epic Games in its antitrust suit against Apple, characterizes Apple’s 30% App Store fees as a "punitive tax on innovation" that stifles startup growth by raising costs and limiting flexibility for smaller developers[1][3][5]. The startup accelerator argues that Apple's closed payment system hinders competition and innovation, ultimately harming both developers and consumers by restricting payment options and app distribution[1]. Industry voices note this fee as a significant barrier, contrasting with other platforms' lower commissions, some as low as 5-15%, underscoring Apple's impact on limiting startup scalability[2].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 6:41:15 PM
Y Combinator has filed an amicus brief supporting Epic Games in its ongoing legal battle against Apple, arguing that Apple’s 30% App Store fee—often called the "Apple Tax"—is a "profound and often insurmountable barrier" that stifles startup growth, competition, and innovation[1][2][3]. Y Combinator highlighted that this fee can be the difference between startups being able to scale and survive or struggling perpetually, urging the court to deny Apple’s appeal against the injunction allowing developers to link to alternative payment methods without Apple’s commission[2][3]. The next court argument is scheduled for October 21, 2025[2].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 6:51:16 PM
Y Combinator has joined Epic Games in legally challenging Apple’s App Store fees, arguing that Apple’s 30% commission stifles competition by raising costs and limiting innovation in the startup ecosystem[2][3]. Y Combinator highlighted that this fee represents a "profound and often insurmountable barrier to entry" for startups, hindering their ability to scale, hire, and reinvest, thus reshaping the competitive landscape by favoring established players over emerging companies[3]. They advocate ending Apple's anti-steering rules to allow startups more freedom to compete and innovate in app distribution and payments[2][3].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 7:01:16 PM
Y Combinator has filed an amicus brief supporting Epic Games, criticizing Apple’s 30% App Store fee as a "tax on innovation" that stunts startup growth globally by raising costs and limiting competition[1][4]. This stance highlights the broad international impact, as developers worldwide face restricted payment options and higher costs due to Apple's closed ecosystem, which Y Combinator argues harms innovation and consumer choice[1]. The brief amplifies calls for regulatory scrutiny beyond the U.S., signaling a growing international pushback against Apple's App Store policies[4].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 7:11:23 PM
Y Combinator argues that Apple's 30% App Store fee—often called the "Apple Tax"—is a critical barrier stifling startup growth and innovation by significantly reducing the capital startups can reinvest to scale and hire. They highlight that with Apple's enforced anti-steering rules requiring all payments through Apple’s system, this fee becomes a "profound and often insurmountable barrier" that limits competition, as only startups earning under $1 million annually qualify for a reduced 15% rate, which still applies unevenly[2][3][1]. Y Combinator supports permanently ending these anti-steering restraints to foster greater flexibility in payment methods and distribution, a move they say has already revived investor interest in app-based businesse
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 7:21:19 PM
Y Combinator’s recent amicus brief in support of Epic Games sparked notable market reactions, highlighting investor wariness toward app-based startups burdened by Apple’s 30% App Store fees. According to Y Combinator, these fees have long deterred venture capital, labeling the "Apple Tax" as a "profound and often insurmountable barrier to entry" that stifles growth and innovation[3][5]. Following the filing, market watchers observed renewed investor interest in app businesses if Apple’s anti-steering restrictions are lifted, though no immediate significant movement was reported in Apple’s stock price as of August 22, 2025[5].
🔄 Updated: 8/22/2025, 7:31:23 PM
Y Combinator has filed an amicus brief supporting Epic Games in its antitrust lawsuit against Apple, describing the App Store’s 30% commission as a “punitive tax on innovation” that stunts startup growth by raising costs and limiting competition[1][4][5]. The startup accelerator warns that Apple’s mandatory use of its payment system and ban on alternative app distribution reduce opportunities for smaller developers to innovate and scale, echoing Epic’s argument that the fees ultimately harm consumers by keeping prices artificially high[1]. Industry experts highlight that comparable platforms often charge much lower fees—for example, eBay levies about 12.9%, and Etsy around 6.5%—underscoring criticism that Apple’s fee structure is excessive and
← Back to all articles

Latest News