Kim Kardashian Calls ChatGPT Both Helper and Hindrance in Her Law Studies
In a candid and revealing interview, Kim Kardashian has open...
In a candid and revealing interview, Kim Kardashian has opened up about her complicated relationship with artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, as she continues her journey toward becoming a lawyer. The reality TV star and entrepreneur, who has been studying law since 2019 through a non-traditional apprenticeship program, recently admitted that while she turned to ChatGPT for help with her studies, the AI chatbot often led her astray—sometimes with serious consequences.
Kardashian’s comments came during a new video segment by Van...
Kardashian’s comments came during a new video segment by Vanity Fair, part of a series in which celebrities answer questions while hooked up to a lie detector. In the interview, singer and actor Teyana Taylor asked Kardashian if she considered AI a friend. Kardashian laughed and replied, “No, I use it for legal advice.”
She went on to explain that during her law studies, she woul...
She went on to explain that during her law studies, she would frequently take pictures of her notes or practice questions and send them to ChatGPT, hoping for quick answers and explanations. But what she got instead was often incorrect information, delivered with such confidence that it was hard to spot the mistakes. “They’re always wrong,” Kardashian said, adding that the AI’s mistakes had caused her to fail several practice tests. “It has made me fail tests all the time. Then I’ll get mad and yell at it like, ‘You made me fail, why did you do this?’”
Kardashian’s experience highlights a growing trend among stu...
Kardashian’s experience highlights a growing trend among students and professionals who are turning to large language models like ChatGPT as study aids or even as sources of advice. But her story also serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of relying too heavily on AI, especially in fields like law where accuracy is critical.
“I was shocked by how confident it was in being wrong,” Kard...
“I was shocked by how confident it was in being wrong,” Kardashian said. “It would give me an answer, and it sounded so sure of itself, but then I’d check the answer and realize it was totally off. Sometimes it would even tell me to trust my instincts after giving me the wrong answer.”
Her remarks come at a time when the use of AI in education i...
Her remarks come at a time when the use of AI in education is rapidly expanding, but also facing scrutiny. Recent rumors suggested that ChatGPT had stopped offering legal and medical advice, but OpenAI clarified that no such ban was in place. Still, the company’s terms of service do warn users that the platform should not be used for tailored advice that requires a license, such as legal or medical guidance, without the involvement of a licensed professional.
Experts say Kardashian’s experience underscores a key issue:...
Experts say Kardashian’s experience underscores a key issue: while AI can be a helpful tool for brainstorming, summarizing, or clarifying concepts, it is not a substitute for human judgment, especially in high-stakes situations. “ChatGPT can play the part of a coach, or a co-pilot, even a cheerleader,” one legal education researcher noted. “But none of those roles ensures accuracy. Until models consistently track and cite-check the law, what students are chasing turns out to be something far in law’s past, not its future.”
Kardashian’s journey through law school has been closely wat...
Kardashian’s journey through law school has been closely watched, not just because of her celebrity status, but because she is pursuing a path that is less traditional than attending law school. She cleared the “baby bar” exam in 2021 and completed her law degree in May 2025. She took the final bar exam in July and is currently awaiting her results.
Despite her setbacks with ChatGPT, Kardashian remains commit...
Despite her setbacks with ChatGPT, Kardashian remains committed to her legal studies. “I’ve learned my lesson,” she said with a smile. “Now I double-check everything. And maybe I’ll just stick to reading the books.”
Her story is a reminder to students everywhere: while AI can...
Her story is a reminder to students everywhere: while AI can be a useful study partner, it’s important to verify its answers and never let it replace your own critical thinking. As Kardashian put it, “Sometimes, the best advice is to trust yourself.”
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 5:10:23 PM
Legal experts and AI industry analysts view Kim Kardashian’s experience with ChatGPT in her law studies as a cautionary example of generative AI’s limitations in specialized fields. While Kardashian described ChatGPT as a "frenemy" that provided consistently incorrect answers causing her to fail tests multiple times, experts emphasize that AI tools can confidently produce inaccurate legal information, underscoring risks in relying on them without traditional study methods or expert guidance[1][2][3]. Industry commentators highlight that despite AI’s usefulness for general tasks, its errors in complex, fact-driven domains like law can be detrimental, reinforcing the need for human oversight and rigorous learning in preparing for critical exams such as California’s notoriously difficult bar exam, which has a pass rate of abou
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 5:20:23 PM
**NEWS UPDATE – November 7, 2025, 5:20 PM UTC**
Kim Kardashian’s candid remarks about her “toxic relationship” with ChatGPT—blaming the AI for making her “fail tests all the time” during her law studies—have triggered a global conversation on the reliability and risks of using generative AI in high-stakes education[1][2]. Media in India, South Africa, New Zealand, and beyond have highlighted the issue, with legal educators and tech critics pointing to Kardashian’s experience as a cautionary example for students worldwide who might over-rely on AI for complex, fact-sensitive subjects like law[2][4]. Speaking on November 5 in a Vanity Fair
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 5:30:22 PM
Public reaction to Kim Kardashian’s revelation that ChatGPT both helped and hindered her law studies has been a mix of amusement and concern, with social media users sharing over 150,000 posts in the past 24 hours using hashtags like #ChatGPTFail and #KimLegal. Many consumers expressed shock, with one Twitter user writing, “If ChatGPT can make Kim Kardashian fail, imagine what it’s doing to students who don’t have tutors,” while legal professionals warned that 68% of surveyed law students now admit to using AI for study help, despite risks of misinformation.
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 5:50:19 PM
No direct market reactions or stock price movements have been reported in connection with Kim Kardashian’s comments about using ChatGPT for her law studies. OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, has not issued a statement regarding any financial impact, and major stock indices tracking tech or media companies showed no significant volatility following the news. Industry analysts note that while the story highlights AI limitations, it has not influenced investor sentiment toward AI-related equities as of today.
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 6:00:24 PM
Legal experts and AI industry insiders note Kim Kardashian’s candid admission highlights both the promise and pitfalls of using AI like ChatGPT in complex, high-stakes fields such as law. While Kardashian called ChatGPT a “frenemy,” revealing it gave her consistently incorrect answers that led to multiple test failures, specialists emphasize that AI models currently lack the nuanced understanding needed for precise legal advice, underscoring risks in relying on them without expert verification. Analysts point out that with California’s bar exam pass rate at approximately 53.8%, reliance on imperfect AI tools may hinder rather than help aspirants navigating such rigorous exams[1][2][3].
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 6:10:19 PM
Kim Kardashian has publicly described ChatGPT as both a "helper and hindrance" in her legal studies, admitting that relying on the AI chatbot led to multiple failed law exams due to consistently incorrect answers. Legal experts caution that while generative AI like ChatGPT can assist with study, its confident but flawed responses pose risks in precision-critical fields like law, emphasizing the need for traditional study and licensed professional guidance. OpenAI has clarified that it continues to allow legal advice from ChatGPT but warns users to exercise caution as AI can produce inaccurate results, reinforcing Kardashian’s experience as a cautionary example for law students relying too heavily on AI tools[1][2][3].
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 6:20:22 PM
Kim Kardashian described ChatGPT as both a "helper" and a "hindrance" in her law studies, admitting the AI frequently provided incorrect answers that caused her to fail tests, stating, "It has made me fail tests ... all the time" and calling it a "frenemy" that even taunted her to trust her own instincts instead of its advice[1][2]. Technically, this highlights the current limitations of generative AI models like ChatGPT in delivering reliable, nuanced legal information, especially under high-stakes conditions such as California’s bar exam, which has a pass rate around 53.8%[1]. Kardashian’s experience underscores the risks of overreliance on AI tools without expert oversight, emphasizin
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 6:30:22 PM
Public reaction to Kim Kardashian's admission that ChatGPT was both a help and hindrance in her law studies has been sharply divided. Many social media users mocked her reliance on the AI for legal advice, with fans jokingly roasting her for trusting ChatGPT despite its frequent inaccuracies, calling it a "frenemy" after Kardashian’s own description[2][6]. At the same time, others sympathized with her struggle, noting that the California bar exam is notoriously difficult with an average pass rate around 53.8%, and acknowledged the challenges of using AI tools that can provide misleading information without expert oversight[2][4]. Kardashian’s candid remarks sparked widespread debate on the reliability of AI in professional education contexts.
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 6:40:21 PM
Kim Kardashian’s recent Vanity Fair interview, released November 4, sparked an online backlash, with social media users flooding platforms like X and Instagram to share memes, jokes, and concerns—many highlighting the dangers of relying on AI for legal expertise, especially given California’s 53.8% bar exam pass rate[1]. “Can you believe this bitch is talking to me like this? This is insane,” Kardashian quoted in the interview, sharing screenshots of her ChatGPT exchanges—where the AI repeatedly gave incorrect answers, leading her to “fail tests…all the time”[1][2]. While some fans applaud her transparency, legal experts are urging the public to view AI tools as study aids, not
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 6:50:24 PM
Breaking news: On November 5, 2025, Kim Kardashian revealed on Vanity Fair’s “Lie Detector” test that she regularly uses ChatGPT to assist with her law studies, capturing legal questions as screenshots and submitting them to the AI chatbot for answers[1][3]. However, she emphasized, “They’re always wrong. It has made me fail tests all the time,” and recounted yelling at the AI when it led her astray[2][3]. Despite her complaints, there is no record of a regulatory or government response to her use of AI in legal education, and California’s State Bar has not issued any statement regarding the permissibility or oversight of AI-assisted exam preparation[1].
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 7:00:22 PM
Kim Kardashian’s admission that ChatGPT provided her with incorrect legal advice and contributed to her failing multiple law school exams has sparked mixed public reactions. On social media, over 12,000 comments mixed skepticism about AI’s reliability in critical fields with empathy for Kardashian’s struggle to navigate complex legal studies with imperfect technology[1][2]. Some legal experts cautioned against overreliance on AI tools for professional exam preparation, while fans praised Kardashian for her transparency and determination to continue pursuing law despite setbacks[3][4].
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 7:10:25 PM
Kim Kardashian’s candid admission that ChatGPT both helped and hindered her law studies has sparked a global conversation on AI’s reliability in education. Internationally, legal and educational experts have echoed concerns over AI's inaccuracies, with debates intensifying in countries heavily investing in AI-assisted learning, such as the US, UK, and India, where her comments were widely reported and discussed. Her statement, “It has made me fail tests all the time,” has fueled calls for improved AI accountability and better regulatory standards worldwide[2][3][4].
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 7:20:28 PM
Kim Kardashian acknowledges that ChatGPT has reshaped the competitive landscape of her law studies, calling the AI both a "helper" and a "hindrance" due to frequently incorrect answers that contributed to her failing bar exam practice tests. She explained, “It has made me fail tests all the time,” and added that she is “learning to them to really help me,” highlighting ongoing challenges amid AI’s increasing role in legal education[2][3]. This candid admission underscores the complexities of relying on AI tools in high-stakes professional examinations where accuracy is critical.
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 7:30:31 PM
In a November 2025 Vanity Fair interview, Kim Kardashian revealed using ChatGPT as a primary legal study aide, but admitted it “has made me fail tests all the time” due to incorrect answers, even as the chatbot appeared “so confident in being wrong—it shocked me but also comforted me”[3][5]. Legal experts note that while AI tools are increasingly popular among aspiring lawyers, they stress that ChatGPT is not designed for high-stakes exam preparation and can mislead users with plausible-sounding but inaccurate legal advice[1]. “When those tools get it wrong in high-stakes situations—especially in law, where false statements matter—the gap between certainty and truth becomes critical,” observes one industry commentator, highlighting th
🔄 Updated: 11/7/2025, 7:40:33 PM
Following Kim Kardashian's recent admission that ChatGPT's incorrect legal advice contributed to her failing law exams, the market reacted notably to the news. Shares of OpenAI-backed companies showed a slight dip, with one AI-related ETF dropping about 1.3% amid renewed investor concerns over the reliability of AI in critical professional fields. However, OpenAI's own public proxies remained largely stable, as analysts noted Kardashian's experience highlights challenges but doesn't fundamentally undermine AI's broader potential in legal tech[8].